|
|
Product Description
President Clinton and other U.S. officials have warned that "rogue states" pose a major threat to international peace in the post-Cold War era. But what exactly is a rogue state? Does the concept foster a sound approach to foreign policy, or is it, in the end, no more than a counterproductive political epithet? Robert Litwak traces the origins and development of rogue state policy and then assesses its efficacy through detailed case studies of Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. He shows that the policy is politically selective, inhibits the ability of U.S. policymakers to adapt to changed conditions, and has been rejected by the United States' major allies. Litwak concludes that by lumping and demonizing a disparate group of countries, the rogue state approach obscures understanding and distorts policymaking. In place of a generic and constricting strategy, he argues for the development of "differentiated" strategies of containment, tailored to the particular circumstances within individual states.
Features
- Used Book in Good Condition
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
- Drone Wars: Transforming Conflict, Law, And Policy
- Going to Tehran: Why America Must Accept the Islamic Republic of Iran
- Machines That Think: The Future of Artificial Intelligence
- The Perfect Weapon: War, Sabotage, and Fear in the Cyber Age
- Deadly Connections: States that Sponsor Terrorism
- Call Sign Chaos: Learning to Lead
- The Resurgence of the Latin American Left
- Dear Leader: My Escape from North Korea
- First Person: An Astonishingly Frank Self-Portrait by Russia's President
- Cyberspace in Peace and War (Transforming War)
*If this is not the "Rogue States and U.S. Foreign Policy: Containment after the Cold War" product you were looking for, you can check the other results by clicking this link








