|
Product Description
The intelligence failures surrounding the invasion of Iraq dramatically illustrate the necessity of developing standards for evaluating expert opinion. This book fills that need. Here, Philip E. Tetlock explores what constitutes good judgment in predicting future events, and looks at why experts are often wrong in their forecasts.
Tetlock first discusses arguments about whether the world is too complex for people to find the tools to understand political phenomena, let alone predict the future. He evaluates predictions from experts in different fields, comparing them to predictions by well-informed laity or those based on simple extrapolation from current trends. He goes on to analyze which styles of thinking are more successful in forecasting. Classifying thinking styles using Isaiah Berlin's prototypes of the fox and the hedgehog, Tetlock contends that the fox--the thinker who knows many little things, draws from an eclectic array of traditions, and is better able to improvise in response to changing events--is more successful in predicting the future than the hedgehog, who knows one big thing, toils devotedly within one tradition, and imposes formulaic solutions on ill-defined problems. He notes a perversely inverse relationship between the best scientific indicators of good judgement and the qualities that the media most prizes in pundits--the single-minded determination required to prevail in ideological combat.
Clearly written and impeccably researched, the book fills a huge void in the literature on evaluating expert opinion. It will appeal across many academic disciplines as well as to corporations seeking to develop standards for judging expert decision-making.
Features
- Used Book in Good Condition
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
- Predicting Presidential Elections and Other Things, Second Edition
- Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
- Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
- The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail--but Some Don't
- Stubborn Attachments: A Vision for a Society of Free, Prosperous, and Responsible Individuals
- Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts
- On Grand Strategy
- The Model Thinker: What You Need to Know to Make Data Work for You
- Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World
- Worlds Hidden in Plain Sight: Thirty Years of Complexity Thinking at the Santa Fe Institute
*If this is not the "Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?" product you were looking for, you can check the other results by clicking this link. Details were last updated on Dec 24, 2024 14:47 +08.