|
Product Description
From Louis Brandeis to Robert Bork to Clarence Thomas, the nomination of federal judges has generated intense political conflict. With the coming retirement of one or more Supreme Court Justices--and threats to filibuster lower court judges--the selection process is likely to be, once again, the center of red-hot partisan debate.In Advice and Consent, two leading legal scholars, Lee Epstein and Jeffrey A. Segal, offer a brief, illuminating Baedeker to this highly important procedure, discussing everything from constitutional background, to crucial differences in the nomination of judges and justices, to the role of the Judiciary Committee in vetting nominees. Epstein and Segal shed light on the role played by the media, by the American Bar Association, and by special interest groups (whose efforts helped defeat Judge Bork). Though it is often assumed that political clashes over nominees are a new phenomenon, the authors argue that the appointment of justices and judges has always been a highly contentious process--one largely driven by ideological and partisan concerns. The reader discovers how presidents and the senate have tried to remake the bench, ranging from FDR's controversial "court packing" scheme to the Senate's creation in 1978 of 35 new appellate and 117 district court judgeships, allowing the Democrats to shape the judiciary for years. The authors conclude with possible "reforms," from the so-called nuclear option, whereby a majority of the Senate could vote to prohibit filibusters, to the even more dramatic suggestion that Congress eliminate a judge's life tenure either by term limits or compulsory retirement.
With key appointments looming on the horizon, Advice and Consent provides everything concerned citizens need to know to understand the partisan rows that surround the judicial nominating process.
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
- The Supreme Court in American Politics
- Ethics and Accountability on the US Supreme Court: An Analysis of Recusal Practices (SUNY series in American Constitutionalism)
- Indispensable Remedy: The Broad Scope of the Constitution's Impeachment Power
- Capital Punishment on Trial: Furman v. Georgia and the Death Penalty in Modern America (Landmark Law Cases & American Society)
- The Buffalo Creek Disaster: How the Survivors of One of the Worst Disasters in Coal-Mining History Brought Suit Against the Coal Company- And Won
- Supreme Court
- American Courts: Process and Policy
- The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Second Edition (American Politics and Political Economy Series)
- The Choices Justices Make
- Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice
*If this is not the "Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments" product you were looking for, you can check the other results by clicking this link. Details were last updated on Dec 15, 2024 13:58 +08.