Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
MARY POPPINS RETURNS
Learn more
Additional Blu-ray options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
Watch Instantly with ![]() | Rent | Buy |
Purchase options and add-ons
Genre | Musical |
Format | Subtitled, NTSC |
Contributor | Kobna Holdbrook-Smith, Emily Blunt, Meryl Streep, Pixie Davies, Colin Firth, Dick Van Dyke, Rob Marshall, David Magee, Jim Norton, Julie Walters, Noma Dumezweni, Angela Lansbury, Tarik Frimpong, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Nathanael Saleh, Jeremy Swift, David Warner, Sudha Bhuchar, Ben Whishaw, Joel Dawson, Emily Mortimer See more |
Language | English, Spanish, French |
Runtime | 2 hours and 10 minutes |
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
From the manufacturer

Mary Poppins Returns Blu-ray + DVD + Digital HD
In Depression-era London, a now-grown Jane and Michael Banks, along with Michael's three children, are visited by the enigmatic Mary Poppins following a personal loss.
- Director: Rob Marshall
- Writers: David Magee, P.L. Travers
- Starring: Emily Blunt, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Meryl Streep, Ben Whishaw, Angela Lansbury, Colin Firth
- Producers: John DeLuca, Rob Marshall, Marc Platt, Michael Zimmer, Angus More Gordon
Product Description
The magic continues in Disney's classic as Mary Poppins (Emily Blunt) helps the Banks family remember the joy of being a child. Together with her friend Jack the lamplighter (Lin-Manuel Miranda), fun is brought back to the streets of London in a celebration that everything is possible...even the impossible.
Product details
- Aspect Ratio : 2.39:1
- MPAA rating : PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
- Product Dimensions : 0.6 x 5.3 x 6.7 inches; 3.04 ounces
- Director : Rob Marshall
- Media Format : Subtitled, NTSC
- Run time : 2 hours and 10 minutes
- Release date : March 19, 2019
- Actors : Emily Blunt, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Ben Whishaw, Emily Mortimer, Julie Walters
- Dubbed: : Spanish, French
- Subtitles: : Spanish, English
- Language : Spanish (Dolby Digital 5.1), English (Dolby Digital 2.0), English (DTS-HD High Res Audio)
- Studio : WALT DISNEY PICTURES
- ASIN : 6317597642
- Writers : David Magee
- Number of discs : 2
- Best Sellers Rank: #17,519 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #7,099 in Blu-ray
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images

David Perkins, Author of SPLINTERED (I was WRONG about Mary Poppins Returns)
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2025A nice Disney effort with later different effects than original. However, First Mary Poppins with Julie Andrews has a more lively score, and more memorable tunes, and Andrews was a better vocalist.
Ssee the original 1964 film first..
- Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2025Fun fantasy movie
- Reviewed in the United States on September 14, 2023If you watched the original as a child, you won’t quite recognize Mary Poppins in her return. Emily Blunt is an AMAZING actress but the director made her portray Mary Poppins as stern and stone-faced, although kind. Still, there’s no intrinsic joy and wonderment in this characterization. Emily Blunt is a physically beautiful Mary Poppins but she was stifled from developing the nuances of Mary Poppins that make her unique, lovable, and unforgettable to her audience.
As for the costumes, sets, and story:
The costumes and sets were gorgeous with quite a bit of cgi. The scene that began with the lamp lighters each posing under a street light was gorgeous.
And the story… I may be too old to keep my attention focused on a story written for children. Overall, I was bored but I mostly was bored during the songs. There were so many songs and I didn’t find them catchy. With fewer songs, I may have been more intrigued by the story which involved working together to solve a problem and overcome the bad guy. The plot was actually fantastic.
This movie is five stars for young children.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 26, 2024This film is fine, I suppose, for young children, but that’s not really who it’s for. Rather, this is a nostalgic opportunity for us older folk to remember the original Mary Poppins (which I saw in Alton, Ill’s Grand Theater in 1964).
Emily Blunt, while absolutely charming, isn’t Julie Andrews, who owned the role so clearly that it was decades before she could do anything with an R rating. Lin-Manuel Miranda was delightful as a lamplighter, but couldn’t compete for comic joy with Dick Van Dyke, who came out of retirement at the age of 93 for a cameo— in which he danced!
So yes, this is a nice juvenile fantasy film, that becomes good in context with the original.
See them one after the next.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2019I was very skeptical of this movie. How can anyone even attempt to replicate such an iconic movie & Julie Andrews' version of the nanny every child wished for? (Even if some of us didn't know what a nanny was...)
The answer is "You don't!" The director instead showed a different nanny, who created her own version of Mary Poppins. Respect was given to the Original Mary Poppins' character with a well written script. There were lines written in that will warm the hearts of fans of the Original.
Though this version of Mary Poppins is notably different, she is still the no-nonsense ward with a quick wit, similar wry sense of humor, and after her exaggerated play at reluctance chooses to go on wonderful adventures into the minds of children and has a great time doing so.
This film was unexpectedly well done! Spoiler Alert. Read no further if you haven't yet seen the movie...
I was very happy to see some of the Original actors playing their Original characters. I had hoped to see Dick Van Dyke, but did not expect to see the old man from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang dancing on top of his desk in his bank! What a great scene that was!
The Admiral and his 1st mate firing the canon to mark time... I could go on, but those who have seen the movie and the Original when growing up will know, and verify that this movie is an instant classic!
Yes. I know that's a BOLD STATEMENT!
It gives me great pleasure to announce that the film did justice to the Original!
- Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2019It's been 25 years, and a lot has happened with the Banks children. Michael (Ben Wishaw) now has three kids he's trying to rise on his own with some help from his sister Jane (Emily Mortimer), his wife having died a year before. He's taken out a loan and when a pair of bank reps show up saying his home will be repossessed if the loan is not paid off in a few days, things look bleak. It's at this point Mary Poppins (Emily Blunt) comes drifting in once again, announcing she will take charge of the Banks children as their nanny.
Based on the Mary Poppins novels by P.L. Travers, Returns was directed by Rob Marshall from a script by David McGee. It's clear a lot of work, talent and care went into the making of this film. The street the Banks live on has be re-created meticulously as has some of the London environs. There's a musical sequence featuring live actors and animated characters. The cast is great, also featuring Lin-Manuel Miranda as lamplighter Jack and Colin Firth as the corrupt bank chairman Wilkins. Dick Van Dyke (Chimney sweep Bert in the original film), Meryl Streep and Angela Lansbury show up in cameos. The film as a whole looks like it was shot back in the mid 1960's in terms style.
Despite that, I couldn't get past the feeling Mary Poppins Returns felt like a re-hash of the original tale with new songs, dance numbers and situations pasted over it. Instead of Bert, we have Jack, who leads our cast on a nighttime romp through London with his fellow 'leeries' at one point singing tongue twisting lyrics not unlike Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious. Instead of jumping into a chalk painting, our cast jump into a china bowl and encounter animated animals. The tea party on the ceiling has been replaced by the upside-down shop Mary's cousin Topsy (Streep) lives in. The members of the bank are once again the main antagonists. Angela Lansbury replaces the Bird Woman as the Balloon Woman and the whole cast ends up in a sequence not unlike the kite flying one from the original film.
There's maybe three songs that really stood out to me, and well, in the long run I just didn't feel the magic even though Mary Poppins Returns is trying to shove it down your throat sideways in a nostalgic way. Maybe it's because I grew up with the original and can still sing the freaking songs from it after all these years.
That said, I'm not going to tell folks not to watch it, as mentioned, it is well done with a great cast, and a film for the whole family. It just feels like I've seen it all before and the original was better.
Top reviews from other countries
-
Ulf P......Reviewed in Germany on January 3, 2025
5.0 out of 5 stars DVD
ist ok
- K PReviewed in the United Kingdom on July 19, 2024
5.0 out of 5 stars Entertainment
Arrived on time.
-
HiroReviewed in Japan on November 10, 2024
4.0 out of 5 stars 楽しめました。
昔のと比べて観ても単独で観ても、どちらも楽しめると思います。
- PatReviewed in Canada on March 1, 2025
4.0 out of 5 stars Mary Poppins Returns
It arrived well.
- WalMart GreeterReviewed in Canada on April 28, 2022
5.0 out of 5 stars Fantastic movie. Emily Blunt is the Marry Poppins for a new generation.
I saw this in the theatre when it came out in December 2018 and had to own it on DVD. Emily Blunt is a fantastic Mary Poppins for a new generation. Fantastic production values and choreography and costumes and fantastic songs. What's not to love?