
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$21.99$21.99
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: white lilies
Save with Used - Good
$20.88$20.88
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: ZBK Wholesale

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Federalist Papers Paperback – December 4, 2020
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length274 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateDecember 4, 2020
- Dimensions7.44 x 0.62 x 9.69 inches
- ISBN-101508481547
- ISBN-13978-1508481546
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- Publisher : CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (December 4, 2020)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 274 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1508481547
- ISBN-13 : 978-1508481546
- Item Weight : 1.37 pounds
- Dimensions : 7.44 x 0.62 x 9.69 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #996,663 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,967 in Constitutional Law (Books)
- #13,982 in Specific Topics in Politics & Government
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers consider this book a must-read for every American, providing excellent insight into American history and serving as a fundamental study of the Constitution. Moreover, the language is praised for its detailed explanations, with one customer noting it contains 85 essays that go into minute detail. Additionally, customers appreciate the book's value for money, considering it worth the effort, and value its perspective on freedom of thought.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the Federalist Papers to be an essential and must-read book for every American, with one customer noting it's excellent for understanding the principles.
"...In this respect, the 'Papers' clearly and concisely outline what the Founding Fathers meant and should be used by citizens, political leaders, and..." Read more
"...These men were considered upper class. They were literate, well educated, and well read. They wanted a country where men were free...." Read more
"...I read this book on my Kindle and found it much convenient...." Read more
"...to why the Constitution was construction to create the greatest republican form of government the world has known to date." Read more
Customers appreciate the historical value of the book, describing it as one of the most important documents in American history and an excellent insight into history, particularly suitable for students studying American history.
"...Fathers was not for their time, or only for America: It is for ALL TIME, and EVERYONE...." Read more
"...surprisingly contemporary in application, and can be a very useful support for any law student or people interested in politics." Read more
"...I found this collection of writings by Mr Hamilton to be a very humbling eye opener as it can clearly be seen how far off track the US is getting..." Read more
"...out the language of the Constitution to give us the best government a country could have...." Read more
Customers appreciate the language of the Federalist Papers, with one customer noting the 85 essays provide minute detail, while another highlights the brilliant writing and mastery of the English language.
"...What I liked particularly: The way we can easily understand all the reasoning behind the USA..." Read more
"...The 85 essays go into minute detail as to how the new government would work, how the states would retain most of their powers, and how the division..." Read more
"...What I "enjoyed" is the expansive logic so well explained as to why the Constitution was construction to create the greatest republican..." Read more
"...of the Publius credits as originally written, but it also lists each paper's true author...." Read more
Customers find the book to be worth the effort and consider it a good value, with one customer noting its priceless contents.
"...this version of The Federalist Papers sells for free, its contents are priceless. Unequivocally recommended to EVERYONE. 5/5" Read more
"...That said, it's not an easy read, but very much worth the effort. Anyone interested in the future of civilization should read this collection." Read more
"...Well worth the very long slog." Read more
"Excellent review that illustrates our good fortune to have reasonable, intelligent and non-partisan statesmen designing and planning for the future..." Read more
Customers appreciate the Federalist Papers' focus on freedom of thought, with several noting their excellent view into this concept. One customer highlights their importance as a structural construct of government, while another points out their surprising relevance to current times.
"...it is one of the best edition of the Federalist Papers. It provided me..." Read more
"...Hamilton's own words are the arguments in favor of a strong federal government...." Read more
"...The reasons for our Constitution being the best guard of liberty, public happiness, and prosperity laid out for the people of New York to read and..." Read more
"...actually is, how it works, and why it is an important structural construct of government...." Read more
Reviews with images

You get what you pay for.. bad edit hard to read bc of spacing errors
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 11, 2013I decided to read The Federalist Papers after a certain Supreme Court Justice whom I admire greatly recommended them as the one book everyone in High School should read. Once I started reading the Papers, I began to question this recommendation: Can someone with only a High School education even UNDERSTAND these papers? It took me as long to read The Federalist Papers as it did War and Peace. And War and Peace is more than 8 times as long!
So, the question is, should YOU bother reading these Papers? What relevance do they have to you today? What about to the foreign (i.e. non-American) reader? Well. Let me simply say this: I can think of no more significant work showing the insights of America's Founding Fathers than these Papers. The wisdom and vision of America's Founding Father's is absolutely astounding: Although these papers were written more than 200 years ago, its authors anticipated many of the challenges America faces today and built in safeguards against them into the Constitution. The political balance of power (between the judiciary, the legislature, and executive departments) is thoroughly examined, and the results of these analyses are deftly presented by the authors in the most powerful ways possible. Each of these 85 papers stands on its own merits as a considerable achievement. Together, they form a monument to the greatness of America's Founding Fathers and the enduring strength offered by its Constitution.
Whether you are American or not you should read these Papers. The wisdom of America's Founding Fathers was not for their time, or only for America: It is for ALL TIME, and EVERYONE. Anyone wanting to understand America's Constitution will come away in awe of it (as I did) after reading these papers. Is it perfect? No. But I can think of no country whose Constitution was as exquisitely well balanced as America's, and that has served it so well, and for so long. The Federalist Papers are a TREASURE whose wisdom needs to be shared with all mankind. While this version of The Federalist Papers sells for free, its contents are priceless. Unequivocally recommended to EVERYONE. 5/5
- Reviewed in the United States on November 8, 2012As a Law student, I can't recommend enough this book because I think
it is one of the best edition of the Federalist Papers. It provided me
very useful additional help in understanding the U.S. constitution.
What I liked particularly:
The way we can easily understand all the reasoning behind the USA
political history, why our constitution has been written the way it was,
and our actual method of government, how the federal government is supposed
to function.
It allows people, especially those who are not familiar with law and political
aspects to deepen their understanding of political theory.
It shows the tremendous change of our political system since its beginning, and
highlights the deviation of our actual politics from what our forfathers had in
mind and how they protected our freedoms.
It can provide a great help to any voter to make a reasoning choice between the
various political candidates.
Maybe I can regret a few flaws:
The way the book is written may look quite tedious and too wordy in an old way.
Some notions may be quite difficult to understand for beginners and may be
mainly appreciated by people who already have some political notions.
The navigation is not so easy because there is no table of contents.
Anyway, this book is a must read because it is very informative, still
surprisingly contemporary in application, and can be a very useful support
for any law student or people interested in politics.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 19, 2013Written by Alexander Hamilton, one of the Founding Fathers of the US, the 'Federalist Papers' are a series of articles written for a New York newspaper. Mr Hamilton goes into detail on the thought process behind the US Constitution and clearly shows the intent behind the Constitution and the BIll of Rights. In this respect, the 'Papers' clearly and concisely outline what the Founding Fathers meant and should be used by citizens, political leaders, and the court system to accurately adjudicate the true meaning behind our Constitution.
I found this collection of writings by Mr Hamilton to be a very humbling eye opener as it can clearly be seen how far off track the US is getting with "modern" interpretation of the Constitution. By reading these papers, you can clearly see that the Founding Fathers were well educated in both literature and history and attempted to produce a framework of laws governing the US that would preculde pitfalls that earlier Republics have fallen into. Yes, the US is a Constitutional Republic and the Founding Fathers never intended nor wanted the US to be a Democracy. We are a Rule of Law nation not a majority rule one and the 'Federalist Papers' makes that more than abundantly clear.
For example, in Federalist #26, Mr Hamilton clearly explains the Second Amendment, clarifying that the 'militia' is all able-bodied men, and that the right to bear arms meant that citizens should have the same type of arms as the standing army because the full intent of the Second Amendment is to prevent government tyranny, not to protect hunting rights.
I believe that the 'Federalist Papers' should be required reading by all High-School and college students in preparation for them to become well-informed voting citizens and able to preserve and protect the Republic our Founding Fathers have created.
Top reviews from other countries
- RebekahReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 21, 2015
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Great
-
Thorwald FrankeReviewed in Germany on November 29, 2013
5.0 out of 5 stars Klassiker des demokratischen Denkens - moderner als die Gegenwart!
Jeder weiß, dass die Verfassung der USA ein Musterbild für einen demokratischen Staat ist, und ein Musterbild für einen Bundesstaat noch dazu. Aber warum eigentlich? Was sind die Ideen hinter den teilweise seltsam anmutenden Regelungen dieser Verfassung? Diese Frage wird nicht von der Verfassung selbst beantwortet, sondern von den sogenannten "Federalist Papers", einer Reihe von Zeitungsartikeln von 1787/88, die das Volk des Staates New York davon überzeugen sollten, der vorgeschlagenen Verfassung zuzustimmen. Dieser Klassiker der politischen Philosophie ist auch heute noch lesenswert, weil er Weisheit und Einsicht des Lesers fördert, und weil er zu kritischem Nachdenken über die eigene, heutige Staatsverfassung herausfordert.
Wenn man die eigene Verfassung oder die derzeitige Verfassung der Europäischen Union mit den Ideen der US-Verfassung vergleicht, überkommt einen nicht selten der Zorn über so viel Unsinn und interessegeleiteten Polit-Traditionalismus in Europa, und der Neid auf so viel Klugheit und 200jährige Modernität in Amerika. Fast möchte man zum Revolutionär werden ...
Zum Inhalt:
Die "Federalist Papers" sprechen die US-Verfassung thematisch Punkt für Punkt durch: Sinn des Bundesstaates, Zuständigkeiten von Bund und Einzelstaaten, Gewaltenteilung (Armee, Steuern, etc.), Zusammensetzung und Befugnisse von: Repräsentantenhaus, Senat, Präsident, Justiz. Da es sich um Zeitungsartikel handelt, gibt es manche Wiederholung und kein ganz allzu systematisches Inhaltsschema, aber für ein über 200 Jahre altes Buch liest es sich immer noch recht modern.
Es ist sehr interessant zu sehen, wie die Verfassungswirklichkeit hinter der geschriebenen Verfassung diskutiert wird. Häufig entwickeln sich Dinge nämlich ganz anders, als sie beabsichtigt waren. Eine Regelung wird vielleicht nie genutzt, weil sie Nachteile mit sich bringt, eine andere Regelung wird anders genutzt, als gedacht. Die Balance zwischen den drei Gewalten Legislative, Exekutive und Judikative kommt in Schieflage und eine Gewalt dominiert die beiden anderen Gewalten: Was mit guter Absicht in einer Verfassung geregelt wurde, kann trotzdem schiefgehen, weil es an der Wirklichkeit vorbeigeht.
Um dies zu erkennen, benötigt man Menschenkenntnis, Lebenserfahrung, Geschichtswissen und eine gesunde Skepsis. Das ist hier reichlich zu finden und man kann viel davon lernen. So heißt es z.B. in Nr. 71: "It is a just observation, that the people commonly intend the public good. This often applies to their very errors. But their good sense would despise the adulator who should pretend that they always reason right about the means of promoting it."
Manchmal ist es besser, die Verfassungsorgane blockieren sich gegenseitig: Besser, ein gutes Gesetz wird abgelehnt, als dass ein schlechtes Gesetz angenommen wird. Andererseits wenden sich die Federalist Papers auch gegen eine zu große Skepsis und rät zur Akzeptanz von kleineren Übeln, um die Verfassung funktionsfähig zu halten. Besser, die Exekutive ist in einer starken Hand, als in der Hand eines Kollektivs, das vielleicht informell von einer Person beherrscht wird, und man nicht mehr weiß, welches Mitglied des Kollektvs man verantwortlich machen soll.
Die Gewaltenteilung wird hier ebenfalls anders diskutiert, als man es gemeinhin kennt. Die Gewalten sollen zwar getrennt voneinander sein, aber es werden ganz gezielt und mit voller Absicht diverse Überschneidungen der Gewalten in die Verfassung eingebaut. Der Sinn dahinter ist, dass sich die Gewalten gegenseitig in Schach halten können, um auf diese Weise ihre Trennung auch machttechnisch abzusichern. Denn nur weil es auf dem Papier steht, ist die Trennung der Gewalten noch lange nicht gesichert.
Die bundesstaatliche Ebene darf sich nicht auf den guten Willen der Einzelstaaten verlassen, dass diese einmal gemachte Zusagen schon einhalten werden - sie werden es nicht, und dann ist der Streit zwischen den Einzelstaaten da: "There is, perhaps, nothing more likely to disturb the tranquillity of nations than their being bound to mutual contributions for any common object that does not yield an equal and coincident benefit. For it is an observation, as true as it is trite, that there is nothing men differ so readily about as the payment of money." (Nr. 7). - Der Bundesstaat muss vielmehr unabhängig von der Zustimmung der Einzelstaaten handlungsfähig sein, indem er z.B. eigene Beamte hat und eigene Steuern direkt beim Bürger eintreibt. Die Einzelstaaten und der Bundesstaat wirtschaften völlig unabhängig voneinander. Dann können Gerechtigkeits- und Verteilungsprobleme gar nicht erst entstehen.
Antike:
Es ist hochinteressant zu sehen, wie die "Federalist Papers" das antike Erbe aufgreifen! Anders als man meinen könnte, wird nicht - praktisch überhaupt nicht! - auf die politische Philosophie der Antike zurückgegriffen. Was Platon, Aristoteles und Cicero über Demokratie und gemischte Verfassung, den Kreislauf der Staatsformen und die Vorzüge der römischen Republik geschrieben haben, wird nirgendwo als Argument herangezogen.
Den Grund erfährt man in Nr. 14 im Rahmen einer Lobrede auf das amerikanische politische Denken: "But why is the experiment of an extended republic to be rejected, merely because it may comprise what is new? Is it not the glory of the people of America, that, whilst they have paid a decent regard to the opinions of former times and other nations, they have not suffered a blind veneration for antiquity, for custom, or for names, to overrule the suggestions of their own good sense, the knowledge of their own situation, and the lessons of their own experience?" - Nicht weil irgendeine Autorität einst irgend etwas sagte, sondern nur wenn es vernünftige Argumente gibt, soll etwas gelten. Obwohl dies auf den ersten Blick nach einer Ablehnung der Antike aussieht, ist es in Wahrheit die genaue Nachahmung des antiken Denkens. Denn wie Platon argumentieren sie ohne Gehorsam gegenüber Autoritäten und nur nach ihrer Vernunft.
In einem weiteren Punkt kommt eine Ähnlichkeit zu Platon zum Ausdruck: Die "Federalist Papers" argumentieren ständig gegen die Argumente der Verfassungsgegner. Diese kommen zwar nicht zu Wort, aber dennoch gewinnen die "Federalist Papers" dadurch einen deutlich dialogischen Charakter. Man hat an manchen Stellen das Gefühl, wie wenn Sokrates mit einem Sophisten spräche und dessen Ansichten zerlege, bis nichts mehr davon übrig ist.
Dass die Autoren der "Federalist Papers" die antike politische Philosophie sehr wohl kannten, kommt an einigen wenigen Stellen zum Ausdruck. So heißt es in Nr. 49: "But a nation of philosophers is as little to be expected as the philosophical race of kings whished for by Plato." - In Nr. 51 heißt es: "But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?" und: "Justice is the end of government." ("end"=Ziel) - Damit ist eine teils zustimmende Kenntnis von Platons politischer Philosophie klar belegt.
In expliziter Form kommt die Antike auf eine ganz andere Weise massiv zum Tragen: Nicht die Philosophen und ihre politischen Theorien, sondern die antiken Geschichtsschreiber und ihre Berichte über Zustände und Ereignisse in den antiken Staaten werden exzessiv als Beispiele in den "Federalist Papers" herangezogen! Schon immer haben die Staatsphilosophen auf der Grundlage realer historischer Ereignisse argumentiert, und das geschieht natürlich auch hier. Einige wenige Beispiele mögen sein: Die Frage, ob ein Flächenstaat eine Demokratie sein kann; die Macht eines Einzelnen über eine Volksversammlung; das Amt des Dikators in der römischen Republik. Folgende Zitate aus Nr. 63 seien noch angeführt: "... that the position concerning the ignorance of the ancient governments on the subject of representation, is by no means precisely true in the latitude commonly given to it." und: "What bitter anguish would not the people of Athens have often escaped if their government had contained so provident a safeguard against the tyranny of their own passions?" und: "... that history informs us of no long-lived republic which had not a senate. Sparta, Rome, and Carthage are, in fact, the only states to whom that character can be applied."
Man darf auch nicht vergessen, dass hinter praktisch allen Ideen der US-Verfassung antike Ideen wie z.B. die Gewaltenteilung stehen, die über verschiedene Autoren wie z.B. Montesquieu weiterentwickelt wurden, so dass der antike Hintergrund nur indirekt erschließbar ist.
Nicht zuletzt ist die Wahl des Autoren-Pseudonyms "Publius" in Anlehnung an den römischen Konsul Publius Valerius Publicola ein unabweisbarer Bezug zur Antike. Die Anti-Föderalisten nannten sich hingegen "Cato" oder "Brutus": Der geistige Streit fand ganz auf antiker Bühne statt.
Sonstiges:
Das Thema "Parteien" wird überhaupt nicht angesprochen. Diese spielen heute eine große Rolle, kommen aber nicht vor, was schade ist. - Die Frage, ob die Bürger denn überhaupt demokratisch gesinnt sind, wird ebenfalls nicht gestellt. Davon wird einfach ausgegangen. Immer wieder werden Sätze eingestreut wie dieser: "the people of this country, enlightened as they are with regard to the nature, and interested, as the great body of them are, in the effects of good government" (Nr. 37). Wir nehmen die Botschaft mit: Die Qualität einer Demokratie entscheidet sich auch an der Aufgeklärtheit und demokratischen Gesinnung und Anteilnahme ihrer Bürger.
- JKSReviewed in Canada on June 17, 2015
3.0 out of 5 stars Good, not great
The Federalist Papers are available in many different mediums and can be accessed free online.
I purchased this for the convenience of having all the papers in one place (and not having to print every one separately) for which it is great. This book gets three stars because the book was not proofread adequately -- there is a large chunk of papers where two words are squished into one likethis and it lacks an index.
- ArchiesdaddyReviewed in the United Kingdom on December 3, 2017
1.0 out of 5 stars Book? What book?
Still to arrive!