Discover new kitchen selections
$20.52 with 18 percent savings
List Price: $25.00
$3.99 delivery April 29 - May 5. Details
Usually ships within 6 to 7 days
$$20.52 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$20.52
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
SuperBookDeals-
SuperBookDeals-
Ships from
SuperBookDeals-
Returns
30-day refund/replacement
30-day refund/replacement
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. You may receive a partial or no refund on used, damaged or materially different returns.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Our Non-Christian Nation: How Atheists, Satanists, Pagans, and Others Are Demanding Their Rightful Place in Public Life Hardcover – June 11, 2019

4.6 out of 5 stars 54 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$20.52","priceAmount":20.52,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"20","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"52","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"avnOJsbkUh%2FE9hdsVUdCwPmP%2BvhbYciqQCKPBWqOsEQwop9xwiBNJXNBWL0KPTVWLbBjHs%2F7mFwCuUYEw7ofu7%2BM0kjLyZ1Gu2PUFnU%2BSoDCPsw96NrvxueGI5pCattFt7pRLA%2BQ2UpeuUB1afIa%2B9BWcqmvkfR%2Ba7shsQpVTJD8zhEcRYGLeA%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

Less and less Christian demographically, America is now home to an ever-larger number of people who say they identify with no religion at all. These non-Christians have increasingly been demanding their full participation in public life, bringing their arguments all the way to the Supreme Court. The law is on their side, but that doesn't mean that their attempts are not met with suspicion or outright hostility. In Our Non-Christian Nation, Jay Wexler travels the country to engage the non-Christians who have called on us to maintain our ideals of inclusivity and diversity. With his characteristic sympathy and humor, he introduces us to the Summum and their Seven Aphorisms, a Wiccan priestess who would deck her City Hall with a pagan holiday wreath, and other determined champions of free religious expression. As Wexler reminds us, anyone who cares about pluralism, equality, and fairness should support a public square filled with a variety of religious and nonreligious voices. The stakes are nothing short of long-term social peace.

The%20Amazon%20Book%20Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Timely, trenchant, and tremendously engaging, Our Non-Christian Nation is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding the contemporary battles over religion's role in our national politics and culture." -- Phil Zuckerman ― author of Living the Secular Life

"In this brilliantly erudite and hugely entertaining romp through recent religious and legal history, Jay Wexler shows why, as our country becomes more religiously diverse, non-Christians need to get their voices heard and Christians need to help repair the wall between church and state. A marvelous read." -- Michael Shermer ―
Skeptic magazine

"What would it mean to take seriously the idea of religious diversity in the public sphere? Jay Wexler tells the stories of Wiccans, Muslims, and other religious and non-religious groups outside the mainstream who show what existing constitutional doctrine means in practice. The picture he paints provokes us to think differently about what that doctrine should be." -- Mark Tushnet ―
Harvard Law School

"In this fine book, Jay Wexler urges humanists, atheists, Satanists, and members of minority religious traditions to take advantage of a fascinating new phenomenon: the opening of public space to a variety of beliefs and institutions. His compelling account of 'belief' in public life will be of interest to the deeply religious as well as those who cringe at the very thought of religion. I highly recommend it." -- Anthony B. Pinn ―
author of Humanism: Essays on Race, Religion and Cultural Production

"A zesty, opinionated assessment of how non-Christians should actually behave....With curiosity and openness, Wexler performs the action that he advocates: that is, making heard a 'cacophony' of voices in public life so that different viewpoints get brought to the fore." -- Dan Friedman ―
Los Angeles Review of Books

"A fascinating read, and a wonderfully hopeful one...For anyone who feels marginalized as a pagan, nonbeliever, or just not a Christian, it's a manifesto for effective and often hilarious resistance." --
Houston Chronicle

"Wexler...has made a timely, at times funny, and compelling piece of reportage looking at a variety of religious groups, as well as a strong argument for the importance of a pluralistic society." --
The Boston Globe

"[T]his book was written for the general public, which often struggles to understand the jurisprudence surrounding religious freedom. Even professors of religious studies often need help in this area....Wexler's writing makes this book ideal for getting undergraduates interested in these issues." -- Joseph Laycock ―
Journal of the American Academy of Religion

"[An] artfully presented, quite accessible, guide to major legal issues faced by minority faiths in America...recommended for all interested in such topics." -- James T. Richardson ―
Nova Religio

"Wexler's greatest strength is his ability to describe current case law in readily digestible terms, making his work an ideal resource for undergraduates interested in religion and American politics. . .[T]his work can serve as an ideal entry point into important classroom conversations regarding the place of religions, especially minorities, in American law, as well as how both public and legal discourses have shaped the role of religion in American life." -- Savannah Finver ―
Religious Studies Review

About the Author

A Professor at Boston University School of Law, Jay Wexler is also a humorist, short story writer, and novelist. A one-time clerk to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and former lawyer at the US Department of Justice, he has written for National Geographic, The Boston Globe, McSweeney's Internet Tendency, Salon, and many other outlets. His books include When God Isn't Green (2016) and Holy Hullabaloos.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Redwood Press; 1st edition (June 11, 2019)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 216 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0804798990
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0804798990
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.05 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.3 x 1 x 9.1 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.6 out of 5 stars 54 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Jay Wexler
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Jay Wexler is a professor at the Boston University School of Law, where he has taught since 2001. Prior to teaching, Wexler studied religion at the University of Chicago Divinity School and law at Stanford Law School. After law school, he worked as a clerk to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at the U.S. Supreme Court and then as a lawyer in the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice. He has published nearly three dozen academic articles, essays, and reviews, as well as over forty short stories and humor pieces in places like the Boston Globe, Huffington Post, McSweeney's Internet Tendency, Mental Floss, the New Yorker, Newsweek, Salon, Slate, Spy, USA Today, and Vox. His website is www.jaywex.com, and he tweets @SCOTUSHUMOR.

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
54 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers
How Will Society Deal with Religious Pluralism?
4 out of 5 stars
How Will Society Deal with Religious Pluralism?
America is a religiously pluralistic society. We have always been this way, but the trend toward religious diversity has never been stronger than it is right now and the move toward religious tolerance has never been more necessary than it is today. As minority religions continue to grow in number and influence, their presence in the public sphere is becoming more visible and the situations and possible controversy that such realities create is the basis of this book, Our Non- Christian Nation. Church state separation is an American founding principle, but as this book correctly points out, the wall of separation is not as strong, as tall, or as impenetrable as many believe. The courts have already ruled that religious groups can receive public funding if certain requirements are met. They can also take part actively in certain areas of public life so long as other religious organizations are given a fair chance to do the same. This has led many less prominent organizations and individuals, among them wiccans, atheists, humanists, and even satanists to demand equal treatment. As you might imagine, this doesn’t always go over well with the Christian majority. This book spends its time examining these unique situations and how communities have reacted to such occurrences; sometimes in hostile ways but other times in tolerant and accepting ways. This book offers several anecdotes and examines the different ways that the majority has dealt with the minority when asked to accommodate views that are unpopular with most of the members of a specific community. It could be giving an invocation, erecting a monument, or any number of other requests. Some of the examples presented in this book are surprising, but not completely shocking. As you might imagine, allowing satanists a chance to deliver an invocation or sponsor after- school gatherings hasn’t gone over too well in some communities. The results are often eye- opening as many members of the public display their extreme ignorance and intolerance when faced with ideas from organizations with whom they disagree. As this book discusses, there are three basic ways that a community can deal with situations involving public funding/access with minority faith or other like groups. One is to not allow any religious group any public access at all. That means no use of public funds for any religions, no opening prayers at government meetings, etc. The second option is to allow the religious majority to control everything and have only its ideas represented in the public sphere. The third option is to allow every group an equal seat at the public table. This last option is the one most likely used in communities across the United States today. Most religious organizations, if they are in the majority, would prefer to control everything but the courts have ruled that they must share the public domain with minority viewpoints. So, the compromise is to allow every group equal access to public funds and public space. This is what has happened in most communities, but there have been other communities that have shunned any public intermingling of church and state because they don’t want minority groups to be heard at all. Again, it seems to be the satanists that ruffle the most feathers, which isn’t too surprising. And in the minds of many religious folks, they would rather have no religious access whatsoever than to allow what they feel are radical religious viewpoints to be voiced in a public setting. Allowing minority religions and non- religious folks to give invocations, erect monuments, etc is the fair thing to do and it promotes better understanding, which in turn can lead to greater tolerance of minority religions. This book takes the stand that sharing is best. After all, the majority religion can’t be the only one that receives special treatment. It must be everyone or no one and I like that this book supports the position of tolerance. In an increasingly pluralistic society, minority religions are gaining in number and this trend is unlikely to end. These groups are increasingly demanding to be seen and heard and Our Non- Christian Nation is a good means to familiarize ones’ self with this phenomenon and think more about its implications. Minority religions are not going to go away, and the way society chooses to deal with different ideas will continue to shape public life and understanding well into the future.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2019
    I highly recommend this book! Wexler manages to be both informative and entertaining as he takes readers through recent forays into the sphere of government by non-Christian, minority religions. It's an excellent overview of the current legalities concerning the inclusion of minority religions in government spaces. Once those spaces ─ like military grave markers, holiday displays, invocations before government meetings, and monuments on state capitol grounds ─ are opened up to Christianity, legally the government cannot exclude other religions when they demand their place at the table.

    Wexler gives a good picture of the case law that has shaped our current legal understanding of religion's place in the government. I was surprised to learn that while our Founding Fathers envisioned a complete separation and a high wall between church and state, over recent years our Supreme Court has allowed more and more religion into state matters, thanks to the push by theocratic forces who wish to see America governed by fundamentalist Christian law. With the increase in "limited public forums" created by the government, however, also comes the opportunity for non-Christian religions to demand equal access. Wexler digs into the stories of some of those religions who have challenged the government to grant them equal rights, in an easy to read, fun story-telling approach that nevertheless imparts a great deal of enlightenment.
    13 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on February 12, 2021
    Wexler has written on the constitutional kerfuffles over church-state interactions before, always with a refreshing combination of wit, depth of knowledge, and insight. In Our Non-Christian Nation, he continues this valuable exploration, but his aggressive atheism and love of pot-stirring is on fuller display than in previous works. For readers primarily seeking analysis of Supreme Court jurisprudence related to the proverbial “wall of separation” in our own generation, this may prove a bit more provocative than many titles. It’s not a bad thing by any stretch, but if you’re not entirely secure in your own belief system, whatever that might happen to be, there’s some serious “triggering” potential in this one.

    On the other hand, that’s partly the whole point.

    Wexler is perfectly transparent about his own points-of-view and goals. The Supreme Court has consistently determined that the Establishment Clause does NOT prevent all religious expression or rituals in public life. Instead, the Court has focused on viewpoint neutrality and a sort of “equal access” to the public square whenever religious expression is involved. Most of the cases Wexler addresses, then, involve people from non-majority faiths (or those without “faith”) and their efforts to participate fully in public life, as they believe the Constitution allows. From Wiccan symbols on veterans’ tombstones to Satanic coloring books for little school children, Our Non-Christian Nation covers both the legal struggles and the human stories behind these efforts.

    Wexler makes a concerted effort to treat Christians fairly in this study, but by default the folks who throw the biggest fits, resort to threats, ugliness, and vandalism, and otherwise bully and overwhelm anyone whose big scary belief system they fear and loathe, don’t tend to be the best and brightest Christianity has to offer. While he avoids coming right out and noticing that ignorance and venom are not merely tolerated, but largely celebrated among the religious right in the 21st century, both are on full display in many of Wexler’s accounts. That said, he’s quick to highlight times the opposite is true. Still, readers who tend to feel overly persecuted or violated by every little thing may want to try a different treatment of this particular subject – they are out there.

    Overall, this is as much a book about human nature and American society as it is about Supreme Court reasoning. It’s imminently readable and accessible even for those unfamiliar with the specifics of recent jurisprudence, although it might prompt some readers to dig a little deeper on a few topics mentioned along the way. Our Non-Christian Nation is hopeful in spite of itself, and anchored in a genuine conviction that knowledge and exposure tend to bring about tolerance – maybe even understanding. Perhaps the primary motivation for those who don’t fit the majority ideology to continue pushing their way into the public conversation, despite the threats, the abuse, and the ugliness which inevitably rain down on them as a result, is something bigger than validation or acceptance of their specific belief system. Maybe it’s about forcing all of us to become a little bit better informed, and perhaps even a little bit better... period.
    One person found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2019
    The First Amendment of the Constitution lays out freedom of religion. It doesn’t say “separation of Church and State.” It says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” The first part is referred to as the “Establishment Clause.” The second part is referred to as the “Free Exercise Clause.” The book refers to a string of cases, beginning in 1947, trying to interpret the First Amendment. In the past couple of decades, “the Court has either expanded religion’s right to access public money, property, and institutions, or it has confirmed what many hoped was religion’s right to access these things.”

    The Courts have to make sure one religion is not favored over another. This means that if the Christians have a right, so do Muslims, Atheists, Hindus, Scientologists, Westboro Baptists, and Satanists. If the Ten Commandments can be displayed, how can the symbol of another religion be excluded? It is therefore not surprising that some of these situations have turned up in Court. Nor is it surprising that the author of such a book should be a Law School teacher, who is interested enough in the subject to track down some of the interesting people he writes about.

    Of course, the Christians (admittedly a diverse group) are the majority in this country. Unaccustomed to challenges, they sometimes would rather give up a benefit (think Ten Commandments at the Courthouse) rather than have it appear beside a symbol of another religion (think Wiccan or Satanist). Hence arise the stories Wexler relates in his book.

    Some of the areas he explores are religious displays on public property (think crèche at Christmas); prayers before town board meetings; proselytizing children in after-school groups (think clubs with games, prizes, treats), and using government funding for religious organizations.

    Decisions are not simple. Example: In a question about government funding for religious school audiovisual equipment, which could be used for secular or religious training, the author reviewed the Supreme Court conclusions: Four justices thought since the aid itself wasn’t religious, it didn’t matter one whit whether it could be diverted to religious uses. Two justices thought it would be unconstitutional to divert the aid to religious uses, but there was no evidence that it had been diverted for this. Three justices thought it was unconstitutional because the equipment was “highly susceptible” to being diverted for religious uses.

    No wonder the Founders, in their wisdom, penned the First Amendment!
    15 people found this helpful
    Report