-46% $17.39$17.39
$3.99 delivery Thursday, January 23
Ships from: Maks Booker Sold by: Maks Booker
$15.63$15.63
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Cheburashka's Store
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Hellfire Nation: The Politics of Sin in American History Paperback – July 11, 2004
Purchase options and add-ons
From the colonial era to the present day, Americans embraced a Providential mission, tangled with devils, and aspired to save the world. Moral fervor ignited our fiercest social conflicts—but it also moved dreamers to remake the nation in the name of social justice. Moral crusades inspired abolition, woman suffrage, and civil rights, even as they led Americans to hang witches, enslave Africans, and ban liquor. Today these moral arguments continue, influencing the debate over everything from abortion to foreign policy.
Written with passion and deep insight, Hellfire Nation tells the story of a brawling, raucous, religious people. Morone shows how fears of sin and dreams of virtue defined the shape of the nation.
- Print length592 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherYale University Press
- Publication dateJuly 11, 2004
- Dimensions9.14 x 6.18 x 1.52 inches
- ISBN-109780300105179
- ISBN-13978-0300105179
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
"This is American history the way I like it, prodigiously researched and vivaciously told. Mr. Morone has a knack for peeling off veneers, for locating the surprising fact, for adopting the unexpected and illuminating slant. He is a rarity, a scholar who is never boring."—Tracy Kidder, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Soul of a New Machine
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 0300105177
- Publisher : Yale University Press (July 11, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 592 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780300105179
- ISBN-13 : 978-0300105179
- Item Weight : 1.82 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.14 x 6.18 x 1.52 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #239,049 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #235 in Church & State Religious Studies
- #260 in History of Religion & Politics
- #328 in Science & Religion (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book engaging and informative. They appreciate the author's historical details and interpretation of American history through religious lenses. The book explores the American jeremiad, a long tale of woe expressed by an American.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book interesting and lively. They appreciate the well-researched and well-written content, which is accessible to both believers and non-believers alike. The commentary provides valuable insights.
"...Proceeding chronologically, with wonderful commentary, it's a book we wish would be required reading in every high school's and college's history..." Read more
"...politics from the early colonial period to the present in this fascinating, lively book. Morone is a serious scholar on holiday here...." Read more
"...I highly recommend Hellfire Nation. It is scholarly yet approachable, both historical and current, but above all it makes the reader consider the..." Read more
"...I was surprised and happy to learn that the book was actually enjoyable and very interesting...." Read more
Customers appreciate the author's historical detail and his attempt to reinterpret American history through the lens of religion. They find the book good history, but only average politics. The author also defines and explores the American jeremiad, which is a long tale of woe expressed by an American.
"...History buffs will especially enjoy the author's marshaling of historical detail in his accounts of Puriitan morality, prohibition, purity crusades..." Read more
"...It is scholarly yet approachable, both historical and current, but above all it makes the reader consider the American experience in the new light..." Read more
"Morone's study is a fascinating attempt to reinterpret American history through the lens of religion and morality...." Read more
"Excellent historical narrative..." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 9, 2010August 9, 2010
SHOULD BE IN EVERY HISTORY CLASSROOM IN AMERICA
A Hellfire Nation Toasts the Immigrants
As we reflect upon the state of the Union in the extreme summer heat of July, 2010, with its endless procession of 90 plus degree days and high humidity, and with the still heated debate over Global Warming producing further carbon dioxide but no legislation, it only seems natural that when it comes to reading lists, we should once again recommend James A. Morone's Hellfire Nation: The Politics of Sin in American History (2003). The book was also recommending itself because of the summer dynamics of the debate over immigration, a policy issue conservatives never seem to tire of working, even though it has so many twisting strands that it's never entirely clear just how it is going to affect our politics. The hope of the Right is that the Democratic stance will further alienate the "blue collar" constituency, which will be losing their jobs and paying for immigrant "welfare" at the same time. What caught our eye was an article which contained a number of these tricky strands and which appeared in the July 19th edition of the NYTimes: "Obama Wins Unlikely Allies in Immigration," by Laurie Goodstein. The unlikely allies for Obama in this case are some "evangelical Christian leaders," although we have to note that the ones cited tend to come from the conservative portion of the evangelical movement - a movement which has a broader range when it gets mapped upon the political spectrum, although it's probably true that the majority lean right in politics.
Two quotes in particular got us to thinking about the grand issues raised in Hellfire Nation. The first, from the well known Reverend Richard D. Land, who is the president of the public policy arm of the Southern Baptist Convention, is revealing for the way he views the potential for a new conservative coalition. That would be the one with Hispanics forming a crucial part, hence his support for Obama's policy position on immigration. Land says "Hispanics are religious, family-oriented, pro-life, entrepreneurial...they are hard-wired social conservatives, unless they're driven away."
Yet this moderate approach to the issue doesn't sit well at all with other more traditional religious conservatives, who place the sin-crime dynamic front and center for the 12 million or so Hispanic immigrants in the U.S. Thus Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice, says "`I think there's a need to reform the system, but I don't support amnesty.'" Bryan Fisher of the American Family Association, sounds like he could have supplied another Chapter in Hellfire Nation all by himself when he says "`What my evangelical friends are arguing is that illegal aliens should essentially be rewarded for breaking the law. I think it's extremely problematic from a Judeo-Christian standpoint to grant citizenship to people whose first act on American soil was to break an American law.'" Talk about "originalist'" theory in constitutional law; here's a 21st century version of "original sin" against the American way of life which apparently can't be redeemed. It's as "fundamental" as one can get in the "strict father" morality of the Right.
Now the fascinating thing is that in terms of older debates about immigration and immigrants, it's tough to pin the 19th century stigmas of lazy, drunken and shiftless - once attached to the Irish, and later the Italians - for example - on today's Hispanics, who are if anything, so hardworking that Land can elevate them to the nation's highest value pedestal: they are "entrepreneurial." So we have to find something to tar their resumes with, and what better way than to say their American baptism, so to speak, is one of breaking our laws. Of course, the debate is heating up also with the national security/911 strand (not defending our borders) and the extra edge supplied by economic hard times: they're taking our jobs and consuming national services - medical care and education, primarily. So, in effect, these are welfare recipients, and illegal ones - charges that don't always surface yet are never far from the undertones of the public debate.
What's missing however, are insights from history and political economy that would reveal in the 1980's that it was the Reagan Administration's fierce Cold War stance in support of the murderous far Right in Central America which sent millions fleeing to the U.S., the first wave of immigration which really gave the issue its initial impetus. As if the civil wars in Central American were not bad enough, neoliberalism in economics has been an economic disaster for most of Latin American during the 1980's and 1990's, no where more so than in Mexico. But don't look too closely; it hurts to see how Mexico has fared after NAFTA and its correlation to increased migration to the U.S. Here's John Gray again (from False Dawn), who devotes about ten blistering pages of that chapter entitled "Engineering Free Markets" to the fate of Mexico: "Market reform in Mexico from the early 1980's onwards has tended to widen economic inequalities and reverse the growth of the middle class that occurred in the previous forty years. This process accelerated with NAFTA, and moved into a new gear with the austerity programme instituted in the wake of the devaluation crisis of 1994 (Page 49)...In Mexico, perhaps more clearly than anywhere else, free market policies have manifestly failed; but they have left the society which they desolated with few positive options." (Page 53.)
Does that sound anything like what is contained in the New York Times article? Of course not. And many Mexicans followed the one "positive" option open to them: they emigrated and crossed over into the United States. To understand how political debates like this one get transformed in the United States, there is no better guide than James E. Morone's Hellfire Nation.
Who Do We Blame When Things Go Wrong?
Morone's thesis is pretty straightforward. Our nation, which still heavily draws upon the moral influence of our 17th century Puritan founders, for better and for worse, has a strong tendency, when things go wrong, especially with the economy, to blame it on individual shortcomings and sins, rather than societal failures like a structurally unsound economy. Actually, Morone says, the Puritans gave us both strands of the tradition, at least initially. When things went wrong in the 17th and early 18th century, their famous sermons, the Jeremiads, not only listed the individual sins and sometimes the sinners themselves, they also pointed out that New England society was collectively violating the "covenant" oath that they had pledged their community to uphold. And, we had pointed out in Sinners in the Hands of An Angry Market, that Perry Miller, America's preeminent historian of Puritan New England, found the greatest of conservative ironies: the Puritans' Covenant was not being undermined by individuals who had morally plunged after the founding; they were following the injunction to work hard at their very secular callings, which were, subtly, decade by decade, undermining the earlier collective moral purpose.
However, in the nation at large, over time, the dual nature of this inheritance was not what was passed on to the broader society. Rather, the sin-sinner-crime of individuals and outsider groups has borne the burden of explaining why things go askance in the US. That's our dominant tradition, with what Morone calls the Social Gospel playing an entirely secondary role, only taking the lead during times of incontrovertible economic disaster, such as in the wake of the Panic of 1893, and after the Great Depression.
Under the Social Gospel, a label which originated in late 19th century Protestantism and worked itself into the broader stream of Progressivism, c. 1896-1916, the terms of the social contract are reversed, the "emphasis shifts from the sinner to the system...rather than redeem the individual , reform the political system" becomes the cry. The Social Gospel, Morone explains, finally became the dominant tradition from 1932-1973, before being supplanted by a new wave of Victorian morals and neo-Victorian economics (neo-liberal) with the revival of the Right.
We have to say that if you're looking for a book that will continue to pay you diverse intellectual rewards through its insights about the American Right, and how our society continually frames up issues, there is none better, and furthermore, it's just plain hard to put down. Proceeding chronologically, with wonderful commentary, it's a book we wish would be required reading in every high school's and college's history curriculum. But especially so in Texas; after all, it was selected as one of Christianity Today's top ten books of 2003.
So let's see how well what Morone calls "The Great American Moral Dialectic" - who to blame - the individual "sinner" or a structurally broken economy - works out in one example he couldn't write about in 2003: the great mortgage fiasco.
Mortgage Fiasco: the Sinners, the System and the Rant of the Year
You've heard it everyday and nearly everywhere: if only individual mortgage holders had exercised personal responsibility, understood what they were signing and didn't reach beyond their economic means, the entire crisis could have been avoided. Furthermore, sins were being committed in many originator offices: applicants lied about their wages, and often failed to supply proper documentation. This was individual moral irresponsibility writ large, which harmed everyone. So the story on the Right still goes. Rick Santelli, the options/futures market reporter on the CNBC network, shouted out the protest at the federal attempts to bail these sinners out: we have no responsibility at all for these "losers" who put an extra bathroom in houses they couldn't afford... from February 19, 2009 at[...], "The Rant of the Year" at [...] (We have to observe that the script couldn't be any clearer had Morone written it himself.)
Entirely missing from Santelli's take, however, is the fact that between 2003 -2009, an entire "assembly line" industry grew up, involving: yes, Fannie and Freddie, mortgage originators, mortgage brokers , mortgage bond insurers, mortgage securitzers, the famous Wall Street Banks and brokers, and the ratings agencies, a system so complex and interlocked, and in reality, so completely oblivious to the morality and/or quality of the actual loans themselves that it simply didn't care whether the mortgage holders produced pay stubs or not. It was a collective, systemic late capitalism failure on a scale the world hadn't seen since the stock speculation and interlocking trust system which collapsed in October of 1929. It's such a mind-boggling systemic tale which is so oblivious to the individual sins of the little mortgage loan applicant that it's amazing that Rick Santelli can, being an observer of sophisticated financial "innovations" himself on a daily basis, summon up that level of anger at the "Forgotten Man" sinner at the bottom of the economic pyramid. And indeed, if you listen and watch the video carefully, you'll hear a little footnote of anger directed at the mortgage derivative inventors higher upon the food chain of the calamity. But it's a wonderful illustration of Morone's book and thesis, how Santelli "balances the moral books" against the individual sinner but not the broader economic system. (And we suppose it's why Michael Lewis gives his new book on the financial crisis, The Big Short, the subtitle: Inside the Doomsday Machine.)
For a good take at how the system evolved over-time, eventually including some affordable housing non-profits, including parts of ACORN, in the Countrywide Credit-GSE (Government Sponsored Enterprises) network written from a left perspective, see Thomas Ferguson's and Robert Johnson's Too Big to Bail: The Paulson `Put,' Presidential Politics and the Global Financial Meltdown, here at [...] ; Part II can be found at
[...] with the GSE-non-profit evolution at pages 8-12 of Part II. It's a good answer to Republican charges of just another "government failure" exemplified by Fannie and Freddie, and makes clear that it was these GSE's imitating the worst of the private sector trends that got them in so much trouble. But we still came away marveling out how many different players, private, governmental and non-profit became enmeshed in the subprime system, and how cynical the covering umbrella/rationale held up over the whole "enterprise" - making home ownership affordable to the working poor - became. As the authors point out, it's a tale from the era of neo-liberalism, and shows how far the dominant philosophy of the age could cast its net.
The industrious, sturdy, well-prepared individual competing for work in the free markets of the nation, has been, James Morone tells us, a powerful, dominant guiding image for our nation. Wherever, and whenever the burden can be kept on the individual, and off the mechanisms and institutions of the markets themselves, then that's been the traditional American response. The role the government might play in making the markets fairer - or indicating when they were not appropriate at all - is usually kept out of sight and off the policy table. But to show our readers just how powerful the ideological image is of the brave individual competing in the open marketplace, consider Morone's description of President Andrew Johnson's prescription of "laissez faire" for the fate of the newly freed slaves in the defeated South:
They had no property, little education, no right to vote, and - in some places - could not even move around freely. Yet Johnson was in no mood to lend a hand: `Their future prosperity and industry must rest mainly on themselves.' If they `fail and perish away,' said Johnson in 1865, `let us be careful that the failure shall not be attributable to any denial of justice.' The market - even American history's most profoundly unjust market - allowed him to pin responsibility for success and failure on black individuals, regardless of their impossible situation. (Page 205.)
And, might we ask, when it comes to unemployment and today's "free markets" in labor, whether that is also the effect of Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke's policies? He has approached the problem from the most inventive monetary policies the history of central banking has ever seen - but he can't seem to find it in his power or his intellectual universe to recommend the direct job creation models of the New Deal era, the era he has combed for monetary missteps, like Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz before him. For someone so immersed in the history of 1929-1936, this is a remarkably blank, and cruel, intellectual page, with untold practical horrors in store for the people of the United States.
William R. Neil
Rockville, MD
August, 2010
- Reviewed in the United States on October 2, 2013James Morone traces the history of morality politics from the early colonial period to the present in this fascinating, lively book. Morone is a serious scholar on holiday here. History buffs will especially enjoy the author's marshaling of historical detail in his accounts of Puriitan morality, prohibition, purity crusades and the undercurrents of xenophobia.
Mirine's book ha a serious undercurrent as well. As a historical institutionalist, he sees morality politics as path dependent, that is, the pattern of morality politics developed in earliest colonial America has persisted to the present day with periodic alterations to address the exigencies of new eras.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 19, 2021When I was studying history in graduate school, among my “go to” sources was James A. Morone’s Hellfire Nation. If I wanted to dig deeper than the assigned reading and investigate the forces tugging at the American soul, Hellfire Nation skillfully painted the picture of America during any given period of strife. If one wants to be sanguine about our times, Morone demonstrates that we have always been a nation in conflict. He defines and explores the American jeremiad, which is a long tale of woe expressed by an American clergyman or leader outlining all of the troubles of society and who to blame them on. In other words, a jeremiad could be a Billy Sunday sermon or Trump rally. Morone instructs that from the Pilgrim fathers to the present, America has always been able to create and exploit “the other.”
I highly recommend Hellfire Nation. It is scholarly yet approachable, both historical and current, but above all it makes the reader consider the American experience in the new light of hellfire.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2013Many people over the years have written about the influence of the Puritans. None of them, however, have drawn such a direct link from that influence to the way U.S. politics operates. That's a bit of a mystery since outside of the frontier itself, it is the Puritan "meta-narrative" that has most strongly shaped our excessively moralistic form of public debate. It's a meta-narrative that fuels itself through righteousness, and the author's emphasis on the Jeremiad as a weapon of that righteousness is one of many potent insights he brings to this historical conversation. The Jeremiad's focus on generating fear reflects an American culture so afraid of difference - in any form - that hopes for a more communitarian future remain much dimmer here than in most other countries in the world. So if we're to rid ourselves of the ghost of Cotton Mather, the first step is recognizing how deeply he and his Puritan brethren have skewed our societal discourse: a step ably taken by Dr. Morone in this important and readable book.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 18, 2018I bought this for a Religion and Politics class and didn't expect much from it. I was surprised and happy to learn that the book was actually enjoyable and very interesting. It's been a few years since I read it for class, but I still sometimes reference it in conversations about United States politics as it relates to religion.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2004Morone's study is a fascinating attempt to reinterpret American history through the lens of religion and morality. However, this laudable effort is damaged by his insistence upon maintaining the traditional academic liberal lenses of "race, class, gender" in every historical era, as if there were no other ways to understand what happened. He also does not take religion seriously enough to understand why it causes people to act as they do -- I walked away feeling like he was openly contemptuous of religion, despite his apparent interest in it.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 18, 2013Just starting out - interesting but language taking a little getting used to at this early stage of my reading.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 25, 2021This is excellent - for believers and non believers allike.