Buy new:
-14% $119.98$119.98
FREE delivery April 21 - 25
Ships from: MBM-Shop Sold by: MBM-Shop
Save with Used - Very Good
$7.48$7.48
FREE delivery April 18 - 23
Ships from: ThriftBooks-Seattle Sold by: ThriftBooks-Seattle

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Democracy in Iran: History and the Quest for Liberty 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
In this book, Ali Gheissari and Vali Nasr look at the political history of Iran in the modern era, and offer an in-depth analysis of the prospects for democracy to flourish there. After having produced the only successful Islamist challenge to the state, a revolution, and an Islamic Republic, Iran is now poised to produce a genuine and indigenous democratic movement in the Muslim world. Democracy in Iran is neither a sudden development nor a western import, Gheissari and Nasr argue. The concept of democracy in Iran today may appear to be a reaction to authoritarianism, but it is an old idea with a complex history, one that is tightly interwoven with the main forces that have shaped Iranian society and politics, institutions, identities, and interests. Indeed, the demand for democracy first surfaced in Iran a century ago at the end of the Qajar period, and helped produce Iran's surprisingly liberal first constitution in 1906. Gheissari and Nasr seek to understand why democracy failed to grow roots and lost ground to an autocratic Iranian state. Why was democracy absent from the ideological debates of the 1960s and 1970s? Most important, why has it now become a powerful social, political, and intellectual force? How have modernization, social change, economic growth, and the experience of the revolution converged to make this possible?
- ISBN-100195189671
- ISBN-13978-0195189674
- Edition1st
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateJune 15, 2006
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.54 x 0.87 x 6.32 inches
- Print length232 pages
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently purchased items with fast delivery
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
Book Description
About the Author
Vali Nasr is Professor of International Politics in the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He is the author of several books, including Islamic Leviathan: Islam and the Making of State Power (OUP 2001).
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (June 15, 2006)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 232 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0195189671
- ISBN-13 : 978-0195189674
- Item Weight : 1.56 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.54 x 0.87 x 6.32 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,994,406 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #996 in Islam (Books)
- #1,644 in Middle Eastern History (Books)
- #2,143 in Iran History
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Vali Nasr is the Majid Khadduri Professor of International Affairs and Middle East Studies at Johns Hopkins-SAIS, and Non-Resident Senior Fellow at Atlantic Council’s South Asia Center. Between 2012 and 2019 he served as the Dean of the School, and between 2009 and 2011 as Senior Advisor to U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Ambassador Richard Holbrooke. Nasr has advised world leaders and major corporations.
Nasr is the author of Iran’s Grand Strategy: A Political History; How Sanctions Work, Iran and the Impact of Economic Warfare; The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat; Forces of Fortune: The Rise of a New Middle Class and what it Means for Our World; The Shia Revival: How Conflicts within Islam will Shape the Future; Democracy in Iran: History and the Quest for Liberty; Islamic Leviathan: Islam and State Power; Vanguard of the Islamic Revolution: Jamaat Islami of Pakistan; and Mawdudi and the making of Islamic Revivalism; and also the author several book chapters and articles in scholarly journals, and commentary in The New York Times, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post.
He is the recipient of Carnegie Scholar Award, and the Frank Guggenheim, and MacArthur Foundation research fellowships. Nasr has served on the Board of Trustees of Rockefeller Brothers Fund; Advisory Boards of Blovatnik School of Government, Oxford University; Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore; and Board of International Advisors of American University of Beirut. He is a member of World Economic Forum’s Global Action Council. He was selected as Henry Alfred Kissinger Resident Scholar at Library of Congress for 2024-25.
He received his BA from Tufts University in International Relations summa cum laude and was initiated into Phi Beta Kappa in 1983. He earned his masters from the Fletcher School of Law in and Diplomacy in international economics and Middle East studies in 1984, and his PhD from MIT in political science in 1991.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2016This book is a history, from the Constitutional Revolution of 1906 to the present, of the implementation of two political concepts, state-building and democratization.. It is not about the concepts themselves or the history of Iran, both of which the reader is expected to understand, but their interaction. In accordance with Francis Fukuyama, the authors see them as opposites that a state must try to realize together. Too much democratizing results in a feeble state, or anarchy; too much state-building results in totalitarianism; the problem is to find the right mix. In Iran, democratization has been the deficient ingredient.
Iran's weakness as a state became apparent even before the 20th century, when Britain and Russia overwhelmed her frail military forces and carved out considerable occupation zones. This weak state was a result of the arbitrary power granted to the shah ("king"), who readily gave foreigners concessions in return for payments. The tobacco boycott of the 1890s had been the result of a concession of the exclusive right to sell tobacco. Iranians reacted by refusing to smoke. The shah got the concession cancelled after paying a huge indemnity. Here we see popular disaffection with the shah, who was granted too much power by tradition. The Constitutional Revolution of 1906, gave Iran its first constitution and a national assembly (majles). The middle-class merchants and ulama (clergy), seeing the problem as an excessively powerful shah, set conditions on monarchical absolutism. The authors comments; "... the term constitutionalism was translated as 'mashroutiyat' (setting conditions) which implied placing conditions on monarchical absolutism." (p. 27) Here we see democratization. But Russia was a powerful force for the old order. The shah's successor turned to Russia and the Cossack Brigade to assert the monarchy's power and undo the Constitution. He arrested constitionalist leaders and ordered the Cossack Brigade (the most powerful military unit in the country, commanded by Russians) to bombard the parliament. Thus democratization was effectively stalled less than two years after the first parliament even if Iran did not fully return to the old pre-Constitutional situation.
Another instance of these conflicting concepts occurred immediately after World War I, when the condition of the country was anarchic. There were pro-communist rebels in Khorasan and Azerbaijan, unruly Kurdish tribes in the north, and various semi-autonomous states in the southeast. Reza Khan, commander of the Cossack Brigade, felt that this was a time for state-building, not democratization; Reza's forceful suppression of secessionists earned him the confidence of the Majles, who forced the last Qajar Shah, now an absentee in Paris, to abdicate and install himself as shah Reza Pahlavi. During his reign from 1925 to 1941. Reza was an extremely energetic ruler after the pattern of Ataturk in Turkey, who interfered with Iranians' personal lives -- no veil for women for example. No doubt there were some Iranian women who saw this as interference in their freedom
But we may not be sure just how democratizing or state-building a state action is. If a police department hires ten more officers, that could be state-building (if they are on patrol) or it may be democratizing (if they serve on a civilian review board). Quite likely it could be both. The authors are aware of this ambiguity and their book seems to struggle with it.. But they do present a detailed picture of recent developments in Iran from 1989 to the present and those who are interested in this period will likely read with attention.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 4, 2011Democracy in Iran provides a good base to dive deeper into understanding the political history of Iran. The book covers the major events in Iran's past, focusing more on the last two centuries. If you are interested in Iran this book is a great place to start and quite a complement to Polk's, Understanding Iran.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 30, 2010My impression is that the author wants democracy to develop (further) in Iran, but may be too optimistic about its prospects -- at least in the short term, without clear plans on how to bring about progress.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2007... A book filled with facts, names, figures, and great perspectives on the before and after of the Iranian revolution.
This book was read in a household where the readers have between them five advanced college degrees. The book was not for us and certainly not for the general public, but written for colleagues of the authors - very pompous (i.e., snobbish) and arrogant (i.e., superior) in its style.
The authors spend the majority of their energy trying to impress the reader with their vocabulary and onerous (i.e., tiring), sentences, one piled on top of the next. It made each paragraph a torture to read and the whole book laborious (i.e., difficult) to follow.
The book would have been much more powerful if it had been written with the broader audience in mind, focusing on clearly communicating ideas and thoughts, as opposed to patting themselves on their backs showing off their command of the English language and its least commonly used words (e.g., millenarianism, insouciant, polity, etc.)
- Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2007The heart of this short book is a precis of modern Iranian history with an accompanying analysis of the social and political phenomena responsible for important events. While the authors go back to the early 20th century, most of the discussion focuses on the birth of the Iranian revolution and its aftermath, leading right up to recent events. This is very well done with insightful analysis of the major trends in recent Iranian history. The authors, however, try to present their interpretation with the major theme of efforts to build a democratic Iran. This interpretation is belied by their own narrative which seems to present the recurrent theme of trying to build a modern state under considerable external pressure. Nonetheless, this book deserves wide readership because it displays an objective view of Iranian history uncontaminated by popular cliches and with a lot of interesting detail. Gheissari and Nasr argue that the residuum of historic efforts to democratize Iran and unexpected consequences of the Iranian revolution has resulted in a state with a strong democratic movement and a number of democratic practices. Unfortunately, this book probably won't reach a broad audience because in the interests of concision, the authors have had to leave out a fair amount of relevant historical background. For example, it will be hard to understand the authors' discussion of 1930s Iran unless you know what "Kemalist" means. The quality of writing is generally good but the authors sometimes fall back to academic cliches. It has an excellent bibliography.
While Geissari and Nasr make a very good case for the potential strength of democractic practice in Iran and opportunities for conversion to real democracy, they don't discuss a real danger of this situation. Authoritarian regimes under domestic challenge from strong domestic democratic pressures have a tendency to resort to reckless foreign policies to distract domestic attention and to build domestic legitimacy.